When the bank asks for your financial status, the answer decides terms and lines. A good financial status shows in minutes where liquidity, utilisation and outlook stand — reliable, consolidated and without Excel patchwork.
What is a financial status?
The financial status is the snapshot of the financial position: available liquidity, bank lines and their utilisation, receivables and payables, guarantees — and the short-term outlook. It is the summary you use to talk to the bank, the advisory board and shareholders.
What belongs in it — bank-ready
A bank-ready financial status brings five building blocks together in one place:
Bank mirror (balances, lines, free availability), receivables and payables (aging, DSO/DPO), guarantee overview (total exposure), the 13-week liquidity outlook with its low point and — depending on the occasion — a P&L outlook (3+9). The decisive point is that all blocks share the same data set.
Three of the blocks have guides of their own: how the bank mirror consolidates accounts and lines across institutions; what a guarantee overview must contain and why expired bonds keep blocking the line; and how the 13-month view connects a 3+9 re-forecast to the cash picture.
Building it: five steps
The route to a first reliable status is shorter than most expect — the data already exists, it is simply scattered.
- Fix the reporting date and pull the bank mirror. Every account and line across every institution, as at the same day: balance, facility granted, free availability. This is the foundation; a status assembled from three different days is not one.
- Read in the open items. Receivables and payables with due dates from the accounting system — the open-items list supplies both the aging and the basis for DSO and DPO. Note that the metrics also need the period’s revenue and purchasing figures as denominators; the open items alone give balances, not ratios.
- Put guarantee exposure alongside. Total exposure and free guarantee line. Not part of liquidity, but part of your bank lines — and a standard question in the meeting.
- Attach the 13-week outlook. The status shows today; the outlook shows what today becomes. The low point of the coming 13 weeks is the number everything else hangs on.
- Datestamp, format, rhythm. Every page carries its data cut-off, the format stays identical week to week, and the delivery has a fixed cadence. With a financial status, being recognisable is a feature, not monotony.
From the second time onwards, the effort is the real metric. Out of a consolidated system the status appears at the push of a button; whoever copies five spreadsheets together every week will not sustain the rhythm.
Financial status, liquidity plan, BWA — what is what
The three get mixed up constantly, but they answer different questions:
| Instrument | Answers | Time frame |
|---|---|---|
| Financial status | How liquid are we right now — cash, lines, exposure? | today |
| Liquidity plan | Will the cash last the coming weeks and months? | forward |
| BWA / P&L | Are we earning money, by accounting logic? | backward |
The financial status is the bridge: it condenses the present and points at the outlook. A profitable month and an empty account are not a contradiction — they are two different instruments answering two different questions.
From status to outlook: the weekly grid shows where liquidity is heading.
The metrics banks look at
Cash reserve (available liquidity incl. free lines), line utilisation, DSO/DPO as early indicators of working capital, and the liquidity low point of the next 13 weeks. These four numbers answer the bank’s core question: is the cash enough, and how sure is that?
Two of them repay a second look. Utilisation is worth showing per institution as well as in total, because it is a single bank’s line that constrains a specific decision. And the low point is only as credible as the assumptions behind it — a bank that asks “what happens if your largest customer pays four weeks late” is testing whether you have run that case yourself.
Common mistakes
Three patterns cost trust: an out-of-date snapshot (last month’s numbers), inconsistent sources (bank mirror and plan don’t match) and a flattered low point. Banks reward an honest, current status more than a pretty one — because it proves you are steering.
The fourth, less obvious one: a status that changes shape every time. If the layout, the order of the blocks and the metric definitions shift between deliveries, the reader spends the meeting re-orienting instead of reading. Consistency is what turns a document into a track record. The forward-looking half of the status — the outlook the low point comes from — is built as described in the guide to cash flow forecasting.
LiquidityLens produces the brandable financial-status report (PDF) from a single data set — including weekly delivery.
See the Liquidity Control Sprint