Skip to content
Comparison  /  Agicap alternative
Software comparison

The Agicap alternative for the mid-market.

LiquidityLens builds on your open-items lists instead of a mandatory bank API — and brings guarantees, order book and bank mirror into the same financial status. An honest comparison of the approaches.

Approaches compared

Focused on the differences that matter in the mid-market. Competitor details change — please check the provider’s current state.

CriterionLiquidityLensClassic cash tools
Data basisOpen-items lists & exports (SAP B1, DATEV)often a mandatory bank API
Guarantees / sureties✓ in the same statusrare
Order book & bank mirror✓ integratedseparate / —
Brandable bank report (PDF)✓ in your own brandingpartly
Hosting / GDPREU (Azure)varies
Getting startedFixed-price sprint in 6 weeksTrial / onboarding

Agicap alternative: experience from the mid-market

Many finance leaders report the same thing: the cash view fails not because of the tool but because of the data connection. Anyone working with open-items lists, multiple banks and guarantees doesn’t need a mandatory bank API — they need an import that understands the exports they already have. That’s exactly where LiquidityLens starts — and maps guarantees and order book at the same time.

Pricing: one fixed price, one outcome

Instead of a trial without your numbers, you start with the Liquidity Control Sprint: six weeks at a fixed price from €12,500, validated against your actuals — optionally preceded by a diagnostic week (€2,500, fully credited). See pricing →

Cost: calculated without an IT project

The real cost of a liquidity solution is often not in the licence but in the implementation effort. Because LiquidityLens builds on existing exports and starts without an IT project, the implementation effort stays low — we do the implementation in the sprint, and your team invests around 13 hours in total.

Compare with your own numbers.

In a free intro call we clarify how the Liquidity Control Sprint maps your group.

Request the sprint